Government, PTI clash over judiciary reforms

by / ⠀News / September 17, 2024
Government Clash

The government is pushing a controversial constitutional amendment through parliament, aiming to increase the retirement age of superior judges by three years and revise the seniority principle in appointing the top judge. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) fiercely resists these changes, rejecting both the extension of judges’ tenure and the increase in their retirement age. Barrister Aqeel Malik, the government’s legal affairs spokesperson, confirmed that the government is considering amending Article 175A of the Constitution, which currently mandates that the senior-most judge of the Supreme Court be appointed as the Chief Justice of Pakistan based on seniority.

The government also plans to establish a constitutional court and amend Article 63-A, which addresses the defection of lawmakers.

PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Khan stressed that such significant changes should only be legislated in the nation’s and country’s best interest, rather than for personal gains. He warned the government against “touching” the Supreme Court and said that if passed, the legislation would tarnish the judiciary’s reputation and compromise the judicial system.

Government’s controversial amendment sparks backlash

Advisor to the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister on Information, Barrister Muhammad Ali Saif, called the constitutional amendment treason and an ambush on the Supreme Court. He criticized the government for attempting to introduce a notorious amendment to the Constitution and the Pakistan People’s Party for being in cahoots with the government on the legislation.

PTI chief Gohar condemned the lack of transparency, saying that the content of the legislation had not yet been revealed. He expressed hope that JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman would continue to stand for the judiciary and reaffirmed the PTI parliamentarians’ full support for the party’s stance. The government is scrambling to court members from various political parties to press ahead with the legislation.

See also  Retirement-age Americans face financial regrets

The proposed amendments have sparked controversy and a political tug-of-war between the government and the opposition.

About The Author

Editorial Team

Led by editor-in-chief, Kimberly Zhang, our editorial staff works hard to make each piece of content is to the highest standards. Our rigorous editorial process includes editing for accuracy, recency, and clarity.

x

Get Funded Faster!

Proven Pitch Deck

Signup for our newsletter to get access to our proven pitch deck template.